I could write a book on the difference between relative and absolute antenna calibrations, but I don’t need to and you should not spend much time wondering about why. Or if. You ‘Just need to make the change to Absolute Antenna Calibrations’ for everything.
But, depending upon which antennas you own, you may find there is not an absolute calibration for your antenna! What to do?
First a little background. Let’s look at a couple of sample antenna:
Relative ASH111660 NONE L1 GPS/GLONASS, base of RF connector->N NGS ( 3) 10/06/02
0.3 -0.7 75.4
Absolute ASH111660 NONE L1 GPS/GLONASS, base of RF connector->N NGS ( 3) 10/06/02 0.9 -1.1 57.3 The Absolute calibration is -18.1 mm from the relative calibration.
Relative MAG105645 NONE L1/L2 GPS NGS ( 2) 00/12/21
0.6 3.6 65.6
Absolute MAG105645 NONE L1/L2 GPS NGS ( 2) 00/12/21
1.2 3.2 47.5
The Absolute calibration is -18.1 mm from the relative calibration.
In general, this trend continues for most antenna because they were NOT actually re-calibrated for absolute calibrations, the absolute values are 18.1 mm less than the relative values. This is because this is the difference between the reference AOAD/M_B Dorne Margolin B Chokering:
Relative AOAD/M_B NONE Dorne Margolin B, chokerings (Rogue) NGS ( 0) 97/10/27 0.0 0.0 78.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Absolute AOAD/M_B NONE Dorne Margolin with chokerings (Rogue, A IGS ( 0) 11/03/25 0.6 -0.4 59.8 0.0 -0.2 -0.9 -1.9 -3.2 -4.6 -6.0 -7.1 -7.9 -8.2 -8.1 -7.4 -6.2 -4.6 -2.3 0.7 4.5 9.1 14.2 -0.1 -0.6 88.3 0.0 -0.1 -0.5 -1.1 -1.8 -2.6 -3.4 -4.2 -4.8 -5.2 -5.3 -4.9 -4.0 -2.8 -1.3 0.5 2.8 5.7 9.4
The L1 difference (59.8 – 78.0) = -18.2 mm (sorry, I don’t know why it is 18.2 instead of 18.1)
The L2 difference (88.3 – 96.0) = -7.7 mm
So if you have an antenna like the NAP 100 with a relative calibration north : 1.0mm, east : 3.8mm, up : 73.2mm above ARP; which would look like this:
Relative MAGNAP100 NONE L1 GPS 1.0 3.8 73.2
I believe it is safe to say the absolute calibration would be:
Absolute MAGNAP100 NONE L1 GPS 1.0 3.8 55.1
By the way, if you are still using L1 only receivers to do static work (I will forgive you if you are running Stop and Go) you need to sell them (PM2, PM3) on ebay and trade-up to X90-OPUS receivers. The days of L1 only should be numbered!
The problem is not only in vertical offset differences.
Absolute antenna calibrations take into account the changes of vertical offset due to the satellite azimuth (as well as satelite elevation).
The days of L1 only should be numbered!
How about SDR? Take a look at Kai Borre s work in samara.
An older article:
Click to access IONGNSS2005_BorreAkos_paper.pdf
A 2016 presentation:
http://www.sogei.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeAttachment.php/L/IT/D/e%252F7%252Fd%252FD.e348579a00eb808085c8/P/BLOB%3AID%3D1064/E/pdf
I am looking forward to the book bundle as promised in the latter.